ShareThis Page

Police identify Connellsville Township accident victims

| Wednesday, July 20, 2011

State police at Uniontown have identified the victims involved in a head-on collision in Connellsville Township Monday night that left two men dead and a third critically injured.

They are Storm A. Grimm, 22; his passenger, Lester J. "Butchie" Walker, 22; and Richard A. Grimaldi, 66, all from Connellsville.

Police said Grimm was driving east on East Crawford Avenue near Newport Street at 10:04 p.m. His 1990 Acura Integra reportedly crossed the double yellow center line for unknown reasons, continued traveling in the oncoming lane and struck a westbound 2006 Jeep Commander Limited driven by Grimaldi, a Connellsville dentist.

Grimm and Walker died at the scene.

A STAT MedEvac helicopter flew Grimaldi to UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, where he remained in critical condition Tuesday night.

Grimaldi was alone in his vehicle.

State police at Uniontown continue to investigate the accident's cause.

In addition to state police, Connellsville police, Fayette EMS, American EMS, the Connellsville Township Volunteer Fire Department and New Haven Hose Company responded.

The accident closed East Crawford Avenue into the early morning hours Tuesday. Police and firefighters detoured traffic around the accident scene.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.