ShareThis Page

Coddling China: Dangerous exposure ...

| Sunday, May 22, 2011

The Steelers don't show the Ravens their playbook. Apple doesn't show Microsoft its next high-tech gadget. Yet the Obama administration just showed top military officials from China sensitive U.S. military sites, in violation of federal law.

The Washington Times reports the Army's National Training Center and Nellis Air Force Base, home to air and cyberwar exercises, were among stops on the Chinese six-day tour ended Saturday.

The Obama administration's bleating about improving U.S.-China military relations thus boiled down to spilling U.S. military beans for Chinese brass -- and damaging U.S. national security.

Giving any nation such access is an insanely bad idea. When that nation is China, it's illegal, too -- under 2000's National Defense Authorization Act, which restricts U.S.-China military exchanges.

That law was prompted by a visiting Chinese officer's late-1990s discovery of actionable intelligence -- a key U.S. aircraft carrier vulnerability. China then bought Russian torpedoes suited to exploit that weakness.

Now, the Obama administration's reckless disregard of that law -- and of common sense -- has set America up for another such incident. And the price to be paid is all too likely to be reckoned in American lives.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.