ShareThis Page

Ferlo fears Pennsylvania drilling oversight hampered

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Tuesday, April 5, 2011

State Sen. Jim Ferlo is calling on Gov. Tom Corbett to immediately rescind a policy change that requires all permitting and enforcement orders relating to Marcellus shale gas drilling to be reviewed by the new chief of the Department of Environmental Protection.

In a conference call on Monday, Ferlo, D-Highland Park, said the order from acting DEP Secretary Michael Krancer would have a "chilling effect" on the ability of inspectors in the field to properly enforce regulations.

Inspectors must have "a free hand to shut down sites," and the discretion to initiate citations and take enforcement actions, Ferlo said.

Last week, it was announced that all violation notices for gas drillers and the enforcement actions the agency plans must be e-on mailed to Krancer.

A DEP spokeswoman said the department's six regions each enforce the rules differently, and Krancer is trying to improve consistency across the state.

Ferlo called that claim "disingenuous," because the order dealt only with Marcellus shale, not any other areas of DEP enforcement.

Ferlo said a statement that the policy change may be temporary is evidence that Corbett's administration "got caught with their pants down" as criticism of the decision mounts.

"It was, 'Let's get away with whatever we can get away with,'" Ferlo said.

In a letter dated Thursday to Senate President Joseph Scarnati and Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi, Ferlo asked that formal Senate hearings be held on the matter.

Calls to Scarnati and Pileggi's Harrisburg offices were not returned on Monday.

Ferlo called on Corbett to come forward and clarify the state government's position.

Ferlo said Corbett's decisions amount to "payback" for the natural gas industry, which supported his campaign, and that his administration is "doing the bidding of the Marcellus shale industry."

"What Dick Cheney was to 'Big Oil,' this governor seems to be to the Marcellus shale industry," Ferlo said.

A call to Corbett's office for comment was not returned.

Ferlo favors a severance tax on natural gas extraction, which Corbett opposes. Ferlo is against the local impact fees Corbett recently indicated he would not oppose.

On Monday, Ferlo said he would want to see a third of the revenue collected from a severance tax sent back to local communities to help them cope with the "detrimental impacts" of drilling operations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.