Cardinal Wuerl: Road to the papacy'
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 21, 2010
A few years ago, we opined that no one should be surprised if the Rev. Donald Wuerl someday became the pope of the Roman Catholic Church. More than a few dismissed the notion. Neither time nor nationality was on his side, they said.
But the times caught up with the Pittsburgh native on Wednesday. Pope Benedict XVI named the former longtime Pittsburgh bishop, archbishop of Washington, D.C., since 2006, as one of 24 new cardinals. Archbishop Wuerl, who turns 70 next month, will have his formal investiture and receive his red biretta on Nov. 20.
And with that installation -- formally known as "consistory" -- Pope Benedict will have chosen more than half of the current College of Cardinals, a number expected to rise to two-thirds given the number of cardinals turning 80 next year, the age at which they no long can vote on papal matters, including the selection of a new pope.
Benedict remains in good health. But he does turn 84 next year. And it should no longer be considered wild-eyed speculation that a catechist the conservative caliber of Wuerl would be considered in the top tier of papal successors.
"But he's an American," some will argue. It echoes the same discounters who argued "But he's a Pole" prior to Pope John Paul II's selection or "But he's German" about Benedict.
But let us put the handicapping aside for now to congratulate Cardinal-designate Wuerl and to wish him the very best.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.