Westmoreland municipal authority sues Trafford woman over crash
By Chris Foreman
Published: Thursday, June 24, 2010
The Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County is suing a Trafford woman who it says caused an estimated $6,200 in damage to an authority vehicle in a December crash in North Huntingdon.
The authority's solicitor, Ken Burkley, filed a complaint last week against Jennifer J. Long, 33.
According to the lawsuit, Long was driving east on Route 30 about 5 p.m. on Dec. 5 when her 2001 Dodge Durango crossed the center line and struck a dump truck driven west by an authority employee.
The authority claims Long was negligent in driving her sport-utility vehicle in a "high, dangerous and reckless rate of speed" and was inattentive.
Court records show that Long pleaded guilty to a citation for driving without insurance and paid a $443.50 fine.
Burkley said authority officials attempted to arrange for Long to pay for the damage, but she failed to do so. Palko Truck & Trailer Shop estimated the damage at $6,236.07.
"We just can't overlook it," Burkley said. "It's not fair to the ratepayers for someone to crash into one of our vehicles and then not pay for it."
A message left for Long was not returned Wednesday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.