Former nurse at MVH accused of taking drug from hospital
By Jeff Oliver
Published: Wednesday, May 26, 2010,
A former nurse at Monongahela Valley Hospital was arraigned Tuesday on charges stemming from her alleged theft of Dilaudid pills.
Beth Ann Soblesky, 37, of 1572 E. Laurel Circle, Mt. Pleasant, appeared before Magisterial District Judge Mark Wilson on a charge of intentionally acquiring or obtaining a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception or subterfuge.
Dilaudid (Hydromorphone) is a controlled substance used for pain relief.
The charges were brought by narcotics agents of the state Attorney General's Office.
According to an affidavit of probable cause filed in the case, the attorney general's Region V office in North Huntingdon received a report from the hospital regarding a registered nurse and the diversion of a controlled substance.
An investigation ensued into a period from Feb. 19 through March 18 relating to Soblesky's narcotics administration and dispensing, primarily involving the drug Dilaudid.
The affidavit states that records indicated "multiple withdrawals of the narcotic without proper documentation of administration to patients and/or without documentation of destruction of unused portions."
Authorities alleged Soblesky routinely withdrew 2mg dosage units for patients who were ordered .05-1 mg dosage units, not properly accounting for wastages and also making withdrawals, under patient names, that had no order for the drug.
The affidavit states that on May 6 Soblesky contacted agents from the attorney general's office and indicated that the hospital's information into the drug activity was accurate.
She confirmed that from mid-February, 2010, through her termination of employment in mid-March, 2010, she had been "diverting Dilaudid on multiple occasions, for her own personal use, and that she had admitted to it when confronted by hospital management on March 15.
Wilson originally set bond on Soblesky at $10,000 straight cash.
However, her Pittsburgh-based attorney, Ansley Westbrook, asked that bond be lowered or that his client be released on own recognizance.
Westbrook argued that his client was not a risk for flight, was caring for her elderly mother, had turned in her nursing license to the state and was being drug tested regularly.
Wilson then lowered her bond to 10 percent of $10,000.
Her preliminary hearing before Wilson was set for 2 p.m. June 3.
Hospital spokesman Kurt Webber said MVH would not comment on the case.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.