Dangerous part of Route 422 in Kittanning Township gets top priority
By Mitch Fryer
Published: Wednesday, May 26, 2010
KITTANNING TWP. — A dangerous section of Route 422 has state and local lawmakers committed to funding a project to improve the safety of the road.
State legislators and officials from Armstrong and Indiana counties are joining forces to push for needed improvements to the highway in the area between Kittanning and Indiana near the fire department station in Kittanning Township in Armstrong.
The section of road has a dangerous history of incidents including two fatalities and a number of serious crashes due in part to a high volume of traffic along the corridor including heavy commercial truck travel.
Lawmakers are optimistic that the project will receive final approval to move forward in the near future.
"It is imperative now more than ever that we work in a cooperative manner to nail down the funding and final approval for this project," said state Sen. Don White, R-Indiana, who is the vice chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee. "Through the cooperative efforts of Armstrong and Indiana counties and previous commitments from PennDOT we have this project on a priority track for completion."
Plans call for significant grading work and the widening of approximately 1 1/2 miles of Route 422 and the installation of a new turning lane in the center.
"I regularly travel this roadway and it is clear this section is extremely dangerous," said state Rep. Jeff Pyle, R-Ford City. "All it takes for tragedy to strike is a second of distraction and a stopped vehicle attempting to make a left turn. It is important that we move this project forward as quickly as possible."
"The work covered by this plan will dramatically improve safety," said Armstrong County Commissioner Chairwoman Patty Kirkpatrick. "This is easily the highest priority project in the 422 corridor in our region and it is not a stretch to say this work will save lives."
The project is in Armstrong but the Indiana commissioners have pledged $5 million of their county's unused federal funding. White also received a commitment from PennDOT for $1 million in required matching money to secure the federal funds."
"This is an excellent example of counties pulling their resources for the good of the region," said Joe Dubovi, district engineer for PennDOT District 10.
"The importance of this project is evident in the cooperation between Indiana and Armstrong counties and the willingness to support a project providing mutual benefit," said state rep. Donna Oberlander, R-Clarion.
The project is on the state's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
It will be considered by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission in late June and by the Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission in August.
The approved TIP will then be sent to federal transportation officials for consideration and approval in October.
Construction would begin no later than 2013.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.