Brothers oversee police in Springdale township, borough
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Friday, Nov. 27, 2009
The brotherhood of the badge now means more in Springdale.
Last week, Springdale Township promoted Officer Mike Naviglia, 37, to chief.
He had been acting chief about two years.
Since 1997, his older brother, Joe, 47, has been chief of police for the adjacent Springdale Borough, both in Allegheny County.
The men, who were raised in Tarentum and graduated from Highlands High School 10 years apart, may be the only brothers in the Alle-Kiski Valley who are police chiefs at the same time.
"At least we're the only brothers to be chiefs in both Springdales," Mike Naviglia chuckled.
He said he will continue to use his current partner, Havoc, a 5-year-old Belgian Malinois, to help with drug and general investigations.
Springdale Township has four full-time officers.
Springdale has three full-time and four part-time officers.
Both departments provide service 24 hours a day. The departments frequently back up each other, as well as other police departments.
In fact, on Wednesday afternoon minutes after they gibed about being chiefs, both men were all business when they raced to Tarentum to help at a bank robbery.
They returned to their municipalities to handle traffic issues and a simple assault case involving two New Kensington women.
The elder Naviglia is happy about the promotion.
"It's good to see him become a police officer and then become chief," Joe Naviglia said.
He said their late father, Joe, who was a Tarentum police officer for 33 years, would be proud, too.
Mike Naviglia joined the Navy after high school. Later he was a part-time police officer in the township, Cheswick and Oakmont.
Joe Naviglia and his wife, Michele, have a son, JT. Mike Naviglia and his wife, Jennifer, have two sons, James and Thomas.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.