Review: Sets, costumes impress in 'Count Dracula' spoof
The University of Pittsburgh Repertory Theatre production of "Count Dracula" raises more giggles than goosebumps.
Ted Tiller's script and W. Stephen Coleman's direction emphasizes the humor in this silly, spoofy version of Bram Stoker's tale of the famous vampire and his victims.
Actors' performances are uneven. But Sam Turich as Count Dracula and Elena Alexandratos as Helga Von Helsing play their roles with the proper absolute-but-overwrought conviction that grounds the story in reality while recognizing its comedic potential.
The most impressive aspects of the show are scenic designer Julie Allardice-Ray's elaborate and impressive Gothic set, Don Mangione's costumes, Annmarie Duggan's lighting designs and some of the special effects created by Thomas (Toby) Horn.
"Count Dracula" continues through Sunday in the Charity Randall Theatre of the Stephen Foster Memorial, Oakland. Performances: 8 p.m. today through Friday, 2 and 8 p.m. Saturday and 2 p.m. Sunday. Admission: $16 and $22; $16 and $19 for senior citizens; $12 for students. Details: 412-624-7529 or www.play.pitt.edu.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.