ShareThis Page

Dog that mauled McKeesport baby sent to sanctuary

| Friday, April 27, 2012, 10:44 a.m.
Helo (formerly known as Nikko), a husky that mauled a McKeesport newborn to death in February, will be sent to an out-of-state sanctuary.
Submitted photo
Helo (formerly known as Nikko), a husky that mauled a McKeesport newborn to death in February, will be sent to an out-of-state sanctuary. Submitted photo

The husky that killed a McKeesport infant will be sent to an out-of-state animal sanctuary, an Allegheny County judge said today. County prosecutors and attorneys for Helo the husky agreed this morning that the dog would be sent to the sanctuary and could not be adopted by families. Attorneys declined to name the facility. Prosecutors previously sought to have the animal declared a dangerous dog, which likely would have resulted in its euthanization, after it attacked 2-day-old Howard Nicholson Jr. on Feb. 16. A Churchill man subsequently adopted the dog and appealed prosecutors' plans. Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski approved the agreement. The baby's mother, Brandy Furlong, 21, told police that she placed her son in a baby seat on the living room floor and left the room. She heard screaming and returned to find the infant bloodied, and the husky near it. The child died about 90 minutes later. County police charged Furlong last month with violating the state's dangerous dog laws, a misdemeanor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.