ShareThis Page

Westmoreland judicial candidates have spent more than $500,000

Rich Cholodofsky
| Friday, July 3, 2009

Candidates for two open seats on the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas have spent more than $500,000 through the first half of this year's campaign.

And the top spenders got the most votes in the May primary, winning spots on the Nov. 3 general election ballot for the job that pays about $162,000 a year.

Democrats Chris Scherer and Meagan Bilik DeFazio and Republican Michele Bononi will vie for two seats to be filled from the retirements at year's end of Republican judges Daniel Ackerman and William J. Ober.

According to campaign finance reports filed in Harrisburg, Scherer was the top spender among eight candidates in the primary. He spent more than $139,000.

Bononi's campaign listed expenses that exceeded $110,000, while Bilik DeFazio spent more than $103,000 through the first six months of the year.

Scherer of Lower Burrell secured nominations on both the Democratic and Republican ballots. Bononi, of Unity, won the GOP primary. Bilik DeFazio, of North Huntingdon, finished second for the Democrats.

"That's a big chunk of change just to get through the primary," said Ken Burkley, a Greensburg lawyer who served a stint as head of the county Democratic Committee.

Spending is expected to escalate as the three finalists step up efforts to win the general election.

"It's a big county, and we have to get the message out," Bilik DeFazio said.

In addition to some contributions, she and Bononi so far have largely financed their campaigns through gifts from family members or personal loans.

The three candidates said fundraising efforts for the fall campaign will begin soon.

"It's unfortunate that to try to get your message out, you have to spend money. Sometimes money can win a race, but that's not right, either," said Bononi, who is making a third attempt to win a seat on the bench.

Scherer, who is in his third term as county sheriff, used $88,000 in loans from his sheriff's campaign committee to finance his bid for judge.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.