Phony sign gets attention that Jimmy G's is for sale
By Mary Ann Thomas
Published: Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Sharpsburg officials say there is no truth in the message on the former Jimmy G's restaurant marquee at 1822 Main St. — "Adult Entertainment Coming Soon XXX."
But building owner and restaurateur, James Guenther of Arnold, said there is at least a grain of truth to it.
Guenther closed his restaurant Jimmy G's in August after he declared bankruptcy. In an interview last year, Guenther said storm damage to his banquet hall and a financially tough year did in his business.
Now, as he is soon to emerge from bankruptcy, he's looking to sell his restaurant building on Main Street.
Among prospective buyers for the former Jimmy G's is a business interested in opening a gentlemen's club, according to Guenther.
The name "Jimmy G-Strings" has been floated, he said.
But no such deal has been reached, Guenther said. He is fielding interest from a number of potential buyers.
"I don't care what they do with it," Guenther said. "I just want to sell the building."
The borough received dozens of phone calls and e-mails from residents not only from Sharpsburg but surrounding communities upset with the prospect of a strip club in town.
Resident Carol Morrone of Main Street told council last night that she was disturbed by the sign.
"I don't appreciate the respect that Mr. G. shows this town," she said. "He has given our town a sore eye and a bad reputation."
Councilman Larry Stelitano said at the meeting that he met with Guenther earlier yesterday. "He's upset with the town." Stelitano said. "... He did it as a prank," he said of the marquee.
Guenther admits that he "punk'd" the town with the "coming soon" part of message that indicated he had reached a deal with a strip joint operator. (The television series "Punk'd" features practical jokes filmed by a hidden camera crew.)
Guenther said in a follow-up interview late Tuesday that it's unfortunate that he went out of business, however, "I don't blame the community for my misfortunes."
He said the sign was put up "to bring to the surface the fact that the building is available."
Guenther was upset that somebody took the message off his marquee on Monday.
"There was no permission given to anyone to take down those letters," he said. "They were my letters and my sign on the building. No one had permission."
Stelitano said at the council meeting that he took down the message on the marquee.
Guenther met with Rudzki and Stelitano on Tuesday to complain about the removal of his marquee's message.
As a result of the meeting, a new, less offensive message will be posted on the marquee and the borough will help market the former restaurant, according to Guenther and Rudzki.
"It was a cordial meeting, and we came to a compromise," Rudzki said.
The controversy about the sign has attracted new potential buyers, though.
"Now I have a church and a plumbing business among the pool of buyers," Guenther said.
He declined to give the building's sale price.Additional Information:
'No strip' zone
Sign or no sign, the former Jimmy G's restaurant site is not zoned for adult entertainment, nor have Sharpsburg officials received any request to consider allowing adult entertainment at the site, according to police Chief Leo Rudzki and Borough Secretary Ron Borczyk.
'The business mentioned on the sign is strictly prohibited by ordinance,' Borczyk said.
The Jimmy G's building is in a residential area that is not zoned for adult entertainment, he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.