Bad quarter dooms Ringgold
TribLIVE Sports Videos
CARROLL TOWNSHIP -- When Ringgold lost at Canon-McMillan three weeks ago, the Rams were cold all night long as they finished with 31 points.
In their 52-45 "Coaches vs. Cancer" Class AAAA Section 4 loss at home to the Big Macs Friday, the Rams came out on fire from downtown, but fatigue set in after intermission and they could never recover.
"We played hard, but one quarter hurt us," Ringgold coach Pete Logan said of the third quarter in which the Rams were outscored 14-3.
"Canon Mac pushed the tempo and it wore on us. When most of our guys only play basketball three months of the year, you can't keep up."
In the opening frame, sopho-more Colin McCormick hit two treys and sophomore Andy Stine added another to help the hosts race out to an 18-12 lead. During the quarter, senior Dave Bassi manned the paint for seven points.
The Rams (3-17, 1-10) went on a 12-4 spurt to start the second quarter to take a 30-16 lead, but when Simon Bekavac hit a shot at 1:34 of the first half, the Rams went cold.
The Big Macs (8-10, 3-8) went on a 9-0 run to cut the Ringgold lead to 32-30 at the half.
To open the third quarter, the guests went on an 8-1 run to take a 38-33 lead and they never looked back and Ringgold got no closer than four points the rest of the way. Despite the loss, Logan was happy with his team's effort.
"When we got down, we never quit and kept fighting," he said. "Canon Mac is in a fight for a playoff spot and they control their destiny.
"We could have folded but we kept fighting back."
Bassi led Ringgold with 16 points while Bekavac added 11. Canon Mac was paced by Kurt Bonner (16), Will Glendenning (13) and Chad Hagan (13).
Ringgold resumes Tuesday at Baldwin.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.