Arrest made in West Newton bank heist
By Jeff Oliver
Published: Monday, Dec. 17, 2007,
WEST NEWTON - A Pittsburgh man is lodged in the Allegheny County Jail after being charged in connection with last week's bank robbery.
Jay Oswalt, 36, of the Carrick neighborhood, was arrested in Carrick Friday evening by FBI agents. He has been charged with bank robbery.
West Newton police Chief Gary Indof said the arrest was made after U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Lenihan issued a warrant. Indof did not know if bail has been set for Oswalt.
On Dec. 10, the National City Bank branch on East Main Street was robbed approximately 12:30 p.m. by a man who walked into the bank, gave a teller a note demanding money, and then escaped on foot.
The suspect, who lost a Hines Ward cap he was wearing during the robbery, got away with an undisclosed amount of cash.
Police and FBI agents were hopeful a clear photo of the robber caught on the bank's surveillance cameras and released to various news outlets would help lead to an arrest.
In announcing the arrest, Indof said he was not aware of what information led the FBI to charge Oswalt. The chief further does not know if any of the stolen money was recovered.
"I'm really happy that an arrest was made and that this case has apparently been solved," Indof said.
The bank, which had closed for the rest of the day after the robbery, was open for business the following day.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.