Accidents snarl traffic on Interstate 70
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 14, 2005
Two accidents involving a total of five vehicles on the Speers Bridge Wednesday afternoon backed up traffic for about two hours on Interstate 70.
At about 3:14 p.m., a Ford F350 hauling a trailer rear ended an 18-wheeler on the bridge in the eastbound lane, which has been restricted to one lane because of construction.
The drivers' identities were not available, but police said neither was injured.
Three vehicles traveling behind the accident were involved in a second collision.
State police Tpr. Andre Stenson, of the Belle Vernon barracks, said a 2004 Pontiac Grand Am driven by Chris Casagrande, of Herminie, and a 1991 Honda Accord driven by Mark Gernot, of Charleroi, were stopped on the bridge because of the accident.
A 1989 Honda Civic driven by Molly Baker, of Charleroi, struck the back of Gernot's vehicle and forced it into Casagrande's car, police said.
Baker and Casagrande were not injured and Gernot's injuries were unknown, according to state police.
Charleroi, Belle Vernon and Webster fire departments, Southwest Regional Police and Mon Valley Emergency Medical Services assisted state police at the scene.
Charleroi Fire Chief Bob Whiten Jr. said rainy conditions on the bridge could have contributed to the accident.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.