Short named to Charleroi board
By Amanda L. Hazen
Published: Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2003
Charleroi Area school board members filled the vacant seat on their board Tuesday night by appointing Jim Short to a two-year term as school director.
Short, a resident of Fallowfield Township, topped a field of 10 candidates who interviewed for the position. Eleven initially submitted letters of application for the post, but one candidate dropped out before the board interviewed the candidates last week.
The vacancy occurred when Elaine Pappasergi was elected to both a two-year and a four-year term in elections last month. Pappasergi accepted the four-year term, leaving the two-year seat up for grabs.
Short has two children attending Charleroi schools. Short applied for the seat because he believes the school board "makes a direct impact on many in the community."
"I feel that I can make a difference. I've been very blessed and I want to give back," Short said.
Short is a registered engineer working for Beck Tile Bettis Company. Short holds a Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Ind. and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh.
Short stated that he has no political agenda or any specific issues that he wishes to address.
"I just want to try to help. I want to cooperate with the board and hopefully move education forward in the future," Short said.
The board also accepted the resignation of Elementary Center music education teacher Nancy Lonich, effective Jan 30.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.