Plum property tax goes up
By Karen Zapf
Published: Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2003
Plum property owners will pay 1.28 mills more in taxes next year, the first hike the borough has passed in a dozen years.
Plum council approved 5-2 Monday night a $9.6-million spending plan. The higher millage swells the annual bill on an average home by $137. Councilmen Dave Vento and Steve Taylor dissented.
Vento and Taylor both blamed Mayor John Schmeck for lost revenue, saying his veto of a $31 million townhouse development off Route 909 cost the borough and school district hundreds of thousands of dollars. Council failed to override the veto.
Schmeck said the proposed 184-unit Chambord Estates would damage the "residential integrity" of the Route 909 corridor.
"We let that revenue get through our fingers," Taylor said. "We are not doing our job. So I cannot ask the people of the community to pay more taxes."
Vento said the lost revenue totaled $1.6 million, including $736,000 in one-time water and sewer tap-in fees and another $549,240 in annual school taxes. Lost borough tax money amounted to $91,080, Vento said.
One mill generates $1.1 million in Plum. Next year's budget bumps taxes up from 2.02 to 3.3 mills. The tax bill on an average home, assessed at about $108,000, will increase to $356.
The budget includes a $50,000 allotment for police overtime. That's a 43 percent increase over this year, when $35,000 was budgeted and actual costs soared to about $140,000. The borough also budgeted $41,000 for court time next year.
"The police overtime and the court time proposed next year is astronomical," said resident Mary Louise Anderson, a former Plum School Board member.
Schmeck said police overtime is a "challenge we are all concerned about."
Schmeck said the borough will get back some of the money spent on overtime this year for officers who participated in the Allegheny County District Attorney Narcotics Enforcement Team.
Schmeck also said next year's police contract takes away "abuse of comp time." Under the current contract, officers have been able to use compensatory time whenever they want, even if it means someone else works overtime, Schmeck said.
Police Chief Robert Payne also is reviewing court time to try to trim that expense, Schmeck said.
"I assure you we are headed in the right direction," Schmeck said.
Tax hikes are nothing new in Plum. The Plum School Board has hiked property taxes each of the last two years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.