Officer arrested for obtaining painkiller
By Susan K. Schmeichel
Published: Saturday, Feb. 8, 2003,
A North Versailles police officer has been arrested on charges that he illegally obtained a prescription painkiller from a Fox Chapel pharmacy.
The state Attorney General's Office said Craig Arture, 34, of Brilliant Avenue, Aspinwall, was arrested after an investigation by the state Bureau of Narcotics and the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Arture is charged with one count of violating the state's drug act. He faces a maximum of seven years in prison. He was arraigned Thursday before Pittsburgh District Justice Elissa M. Lang and was released on his own recognizance. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Feb. 13.
North Versailles Township Commissioner Frank Bivins said Arture, who has been a part-time officer with the township for almost a year, had never been in trouble before.
"He will most definitely be suspended," Bivins said.
According to the Attorney General's Office, Arture, while in his North Versailles police uniform, attempted to get a prescription of Hydrocodone filled at the Eckerd Pharmacy on Freeport Road on Oct. 4.
Arture allegedly told the pharmacist that he had to get the prescription transferred from one pharmacy to another and gave the pharmacist an empty prescription bottle from CVS pharmacy with the customer name Jim Jackson.
The pharmacist became suspicious and only gave Arture 23 tablets, police said. Arture tried twice to get the remaining pills before being arrested by O'Hara Township police Oct. 9.
Narcotics agents said that Arture allegedly obtained a prescription for the drug over the Internet by claiming to be Jim Jackson. He allegedly contacted a Florida doctor who practices over the Internet.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.