ShareThis Page

Forensics tie East Liberty man to pair of shooting deaths

| Saturday, May 19, 2012, 5:53 p.m.

An East Liberty man has been charged with the deaths of two men that occurred in the past month, according to court documents.

Julian Aaron Davis, 21, is charged with various counts of criminal homicide, theft and the illegal use of a weapon. He was being held in the Allegheny County Jail.

Davis is accused of shooting Ricardo Cooper, 30, who was found dead on April 22 in the 600 block of N. Euclid Street in East Liberty from a gunshot in the head. Davis broke into and robbed Cooper's apartment, police said.

On May 13, police found Shakkeem Harris, 22, face down near 1600 Villanova Road while investigating reports of gunshots about 1 a.m. at Joe Natoli Field on nearby President Way in Morningside. Harris died at the scene.

An Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office investigation determined that the same firearm was used to kill both Harris and Cooper.

Police were led to Davis because he shot a man in the foot on Tuesday during a dispute over $10, court documents said. Davis had fired the same gun that was used in the Harris and Cooper shootings, according to the results of forensic analysis in the Allegheny County Crime Lab.

Davis, who was charged on Friday in the Harris and Cooper shootings, denied shooting Cooper and denied shooting the man in the foot, police said. Court documents make no mention of whether Davis spoke of the Harris shooting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.