Judge rules Sandusky trial to begin on June 5
Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky will stand trial June 5 in Centre County as scheduled on 52 counts of alleged child sexual abuse, visiting Senior Judge John Cleland ruled Monday.
"Motion is denied," Cleland wrote, rejecting a second defense request for a delay in the start of the trial.
The judge provided no further explanation for his decision, one of several rulings issued Monday:
• Prosecutors must reply by Friday to defense arguments that charges should be dismissed because the prosecution did not provide enough specifics in the criminal complaint and to a defense writ of habeas corpus demanding prosecutors provide proof to justify Sandusky's detention on the charges.
• Defense attorneys must by Friday supply prosecutors with a list of expert witnesses it intends to call and any reports prepared by those witnesses. If an expert witness' report is not complete, the defense must provide prosecutors with at least a summary of the expert's intended testimony, conclusions and basis for those conclusions.
• Prosecutors have until May 30 to provide the defense with a written statement of alleged evidence of misconduct by Sandusky for which he has not been charged.
• A pretrial hearing was set for May 30 to resolve any outstanding legal issues pending before trial.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.