Police searching for alleged armed man in Beltzhoover
A Pittsburgh police SWAT team fired several rounds of tear gas on Thursday evening into a home in Beltzhoover, where they believed a man armed with an assault rifle had taken refuge.
Montez Dixon, 18, was not inside his mother's home in the 300 block of Michigan Avenue when the SWAT team entered, and police continued to search the neighborhood, city police Lt. Larry Scirotto said.
Police were called when several neighbors reported that Dixon was running through the neighborhood, carrying the weapon, Scirotto said.
He said Dixon is supposed to be on house arrest in Ellwood City. Dixon will be charged with violating his probation there, as well as new charges filed in connection with last night's incident.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.