ShareThis Page

Norwin braces for reduction in state educational subsidy

| Tuesday, Feb. 15, 2011

Norwin officials are preparing for the likelihood that they'll receive less state funding for their 2011-12 budget.

Business Manager John Wilson last night outlined some of the moving parts in the district's upcoming budget discussions as officials deal with the expected end of stimulus funding for education and the possibility of a cut in the state's basic education subsidy.

The state's new governor, Tom Corbett, has been directing his budget secretary to shift some existing appropriations in the 2010-11 budget into a reserve fund to stem a projected shortfall and is reviewing a 2011-12 spending plan that projects a $4 billion deficit.

Corbett has had his budget secretary use money received last year from a federal Education Jobs Fund to offset a recent reduction in the state's basic education funding appropriation. Corbett will address education funding as part of his budget plan next month.

The Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials is warning its members that using the Education Jobs Fund now means there might not be any federal funding to ease the end of stimulus funds in the next budget cycle.

Wilson said the district's revenue projections for 2010-11 are in "good shape," but officials sent out a memo yesterday urging employees to cut off "nonessential spending" and administrators are trying to increase their reserve fund as much as possible.

"We got a lot of work," school Director Don Rhodes said.

Board members decided last month not to raise property taxes higher than the 1.2-mill cap imposed by the state for the 2011-12 budget under conditions of Act 1, the Taxpayer Relief Act.

The board voted last year to raise property taxes by 1.85 mills for 2010-11.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.