Judge denies former football star's motion to vacate fraud sentence
By Brian Bowling
Published: Monday, Feb. 14, 2011
A federal judge has denied a bid by a former nurse recruiting company executive to overturn his fraud conviction.
Anthony J. Aliucci, 41, of Mars was chief operating officer of Nurse Resource Group Inc. in 2008 when he pleaded guilty to defrauding another company, Global Nursing Solutions Inc., out of about $1.4 million by claiming to have recruited nearly 200 foreign nurses. He is currently serving a four-year sentence at the federal prison in Morgantown, W.Va.
Aliucci claimed his conviction should be overturned because of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the Skilling v. United States case. The justices partly overturned the conviction of Jeffrey Skilling, former chief executive officer of Enron, last year by ruling that the “honest services” fraud statute only covers bribery and kickback schemes.
U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer ruled Friday that Aliucci waived his right to appeal when he pleaded guilty. Also, since he was convicted of mail fraud rather than honest services fraud, the Skilling decision doesn't apply.
Aliucci was a star quarterback for Indiana University of Pennsylvania. He finished second in the voting in 1991 for the Harlan Hill Award, the Division II equivalent of the Heisman Trophy.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.