Parents of crash victim sue PennDOT
By Liz Hayes
Published: Friday, Dec. 31, 2010
GREENSBURG -- The parents of a Lower Burrell teenager who was killed in a 2009 car crash have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against PennDOT.
Jeffrey and Diana Acre allege that PennDOT's neglect in designing and maintaining Route 366 in New Kensington contributed to the death of their 16-year-old daughter, Kylee Jo.
New Kensington Police accused Jonathan Patrick O'Sullivan, then 18, of New Kensington of speeding and driving drunk when he lost control of his sport-utility vehicle on Sept. 6, 2009 and slammed into a guardrail near Marlborough Drive.
Kylee Jo, a front-seat passenger who was not wearing a seat belt, died at the scene. O'Sullivan, a passenger and an elderly couple in an oncoming car were injured.
O'Sullivan in May 2010 was charged with vehicular homicide, drunken driving, speeding and several related crimes; he is awaiting trial.
He allegedly was driving 90 mph in what was then a 55 mph zone. He also had a blood-alcohol level of 0.06 percent, which is not legal since O'Sullivan is younger than 21.
In the lawsuit filed in Westmoreland County Court, the Acres blame PennDOT for not leveling a steep, 4-inch dropoff between the road and the shoulder. The suit says the dropoff is located on a curve, exacerbating the problem.
Court documents indicate O'Sullivan's passenger tires rolled down this dropoff; when he tried to steer back onto the road, he lost control.
The Acres request in excess of $30,000 for pain, suffering and Kylee Jo's lost earning potential.
Jay Ofsanik, a spokesman for the PennDOT district that includes Westmoreland County, said he could not comment on pending litigation.
PennDOT upgraded that section of Route 366 in the past year after two fatal accidents occurred in 2009.
About eight months before Kylee Jo's death, 17-year-old Colin Grau of New Kensington died in a head-on collision near Memorial Park. That crash also was attributed to a teenage driver overcorrecting after the passenger tires veered off the road.
New Kensington officials and state Rep. John Pallone, D-New Kensington, pressured PennDOT to evaluate the road and lower the speed limit.
PennDOT dropped the speed limit to 50 mph, paved the shoulders to eliminate the drop offs and added rumble strips, guardrail reflectors and more painted guide lines.Additional Information:
The Grau case
The parents of Colin Grau, who also died in 2009 in a Route 366 car crash, hold New Kensington-Arnold School District partially responsible for their son's death.
Scott and Brenda Grau of New Kensington sued the school district in federal court, alleging the accident could have been avoided if Valley High School had provided busing and if administrators had prevented students from cutting class.
The crash occurred within sight of the school on Jan. 21, 2009, after Grau and the driver, another Valley High School senior, left school early without permission.
The Graus' accused the district of willful misconduct and creating a dangerous situation for students.
The case was dismissed in September. The Graus have appealed.
Valley High School began busing students the next school year, a commitment the school board had made shortly before Colin Grau's death.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.