Valley Tuesday takes
Do your jobs: Westmoreland County Commissioners Tom Balya and Ted Kopas are childishly threatening to shut down county government on Jan. 1 unless fellow commissioner Charles Anderson votes to pass the county's 2011 budget. They accuse Republican Anderson of "grandstanding" because he wants to see more spending cuts and refuses to vote for the budget. You have the votes to pass the budget, yet you would actually shut down vital public services just because you're mad at one guy• Here's a thought: Have the county solicitor brief you on the definition of "mandamus."
Another shadow employee: New Kensington-Arnold's school board settled a labor dispute with the district's athletic director by giving him back his job -- on paper. Frank Campbell gets his full salary but may not have to actually do anything to get that taxpayer money. The board threw Superintendent George Batterson under the bus by leaving it up to him whether Campbell gets any day-to-day duties -- all while keeping the interim athletic director on the payroll. Here's to hoping the county DA's investigation into the matter wraps up quickly so taxpayers can know what the board is trying to cover up.
A good example: Amber Reigard, an eighth-grader at Highlands Middle School, single-handedly orchestrated a Christmas toy drive for Children's Hospital patients, collecting 250 toys in all. She came up with the idea on her own, stayed determined and saw it through until the end. She has plans to host the toy drive again next year. It goes to show how the kindness of one person can make a big difference.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.