Allegheny County to challenge voter ID law
Allegheny County Democrats said on Friday they're determined to overturn Pennsylvania's GOP-backed voter identification law because they think it will make it harder for poor, minority and elderly voters without IDs to cast a ballot.
County Executive Rich Fitzgerald joined 18 local and state elected officials at a Downtown news conference to announce that the county Board of Elections will file a lawsuit in Commonwealth Court to eliminate the controversial law.
"It's going to disenfranchise and deny an awful lot of people the ability to vote," Fitzgerald said.
The elections board consists of Democrats Fitzgerald and County Councilman John DeFazio and Republican County Councilwoman Heather Heidelbaugh. They plan to hold a vote on filing the lawsuit at a meeting on Tuesday.
Heidelbaugh said she will oppose it.
"I don't quite understand why we're spending lawyer resources on this," she said. "Why are we filing a lawsuit on the same topic when the ACLU has already done it?"
Fitzgerald said the lawsuit would differ from the one filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania by arguing that the county does not have the money or time to train its poll workers to enforce the voter ID law. He couldn't pinpoint the cost, saying only that it would cost "millions of dollars" to train 6,500 poll workers who receive little pay.
The League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania conference of the NAACP, Homeless Advocacy Project and 10 people represented by the ACLU sued to strike down the law because they believe it violates the state Constitution.
Gov. Tom Corbett, a Republican, signed the bill March 14.
Supporters say the law will guard against voter fraud. Critics contend those supporters can't point to a case of voter fraud that the photo ID requirement would have prevented.
Authorities in 2009 prosecuted ACORN workers in Allegheny County for submitting fraudulent voter registration forms during the 2008 presidential election, but officials said there was no evidence that the faked forms led to fraudulent votes being cast. ACORN, or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is a defunct activist group.
Democrats have argued the law is a scheme by the Republican-controlled Legislature to disenfranchise voters and gain an advantage in the presidential race. Voters will be required to show identification the law deems acceptable for the first time in the November election.
A Quinnipiac University poll published on Tuesday found that Pennsylvanians support the law 66 percent to 32 percent. The survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.