ShareThis Page

Dormont coach arrested in child porn case

| Sunday, June 1, 2008

A Dormont soccer coach and Boy Scout troop leader who was accused of sending child porn to an officer posing as a 14-year-old girl was released on Saturday evening from the Monroe County Jail.

Police say George Michael Carvlin, 54, of 1456 Tolma Ave., allegedly sent photos of young children engaged in explicit sex acts. He allegedly told a detective posing as a teenage girl that he wanted her to perform certain sex acts and made arrangements to meet the girl in Canadensis on Thursday, according to police. He was immediately taken into custody.

After pleading not guilty before a magistrate on Friday, he was confined in the Monroe County Jail until Saturday evening, when he posted a $10,000 straight bond that triggered his release. Jail officials in Stroudsburg did not have the date of his next hearing.

"I don't believe it. I'm just shocked," said Keystone Oaks Area Soccer Club president John Brosnan.

Brosnan said Carvlin is a married father, construction contractor and a Boy Scouts of America troop leader in Dormont. He said Carvlin had told him recently that he was working away from home on a job near Monroe County. Carvlin had coached soccer teams for eight years, serving on the club board for the past three years, according to Brosnan.

Carvlin's under-17 squad had a game scheduled for today, said Brosnan. He said Carvlin would not serve as coach until the criminal charges were resolved and the Soccer Club's three-member disciplinary committee could meet. Brosnan said that Carvlin had cleared a mandatory criminal background check in March.

"We've never had anything like this happen," said Brosnan.

Numerous messages left for Carvlin and the Boy Scouts were not returned.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.