Audit: Oversight poor
By Richard Gazarik
Published: Friday, May 30, 2008
A highly critical audit alleges the Washington Township Municipal Authority's haphazard oversight opened the way for two employees to misappropriate thousands of dollars in cash paid by customers and to pay themselves more than $100,000 in unauthorized overtime.
The audit of the Fayette County authority uncovered "compelling evidence" that the two employees - former office manager Judy Arrow and clerk Laura Snyder - misappropriated authority money by failing to deposit money for water bills that customers paid in cash. Both women were suspended from their jobs last year. Arrow was fired. Snyder retired.
Snyder also was a member of the authority board, from which she resigned after rumors circulated about agency finances.
The audit by The Nottingham Group, of Pittsburgh, was commissioned by members of the seven-person authority board, and the results were received this week.
James Fellin, a certified public accountant and fraud examiner with the firm, recommended a more extensive audit be conducted to determine exactly how much money might be missing. In addition, the audit suggests authority officials meet with Fayette County District Attorney Nancy Vernon and state police to ask for a criminal investigation.
Vernon could not be reached for comment.
The authority provides water service to 3,000 residents in Washington Township and nearby Allenport and Roscoe.
Though Arrow and Snyder were the authority's only employees, Snyder said board members sometimes assisted customers who came to the office to pay their bills.
"Board members waited on people," Snyder said.
Snyder declined further comment. "I can't comment on something I don't know anything about," she said.
Arrow did not respond to a request for comment.
Dee Fisher, chairwoman of the authority, did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Robert Campbell, a member of the board, wants a more extensive audit. He joined the board last year.
"I personally don't think the audit went deep enough," Campbell said.
"They should force the board to resign. Somebody didn't do their job properly. I think the board should be charged with malfeasance. They can kick me off, too, and it wouldn't hurt me a bit."
Joe Walko, another director, refused to comment. Mike Zadrozny and Tom Canigiani didn't respond to requests for comment. Thelma Russell could not be reached for comment.
Fellin said he found incomplete accounting records, payroll irregularities, unexplained accounting entries and missing money during the period that Arrow and Snyder worked for the authority.
Among the findings:
The audit criticizes former authority Chairman Melvin Weiss and Treasurer Ron Sotta for failing to oversee management of the authority.
Weiss said he was chairman "in name only" and was saddled with personal problems during his tenure that prevented him from keeping tabs on authority operations.
"I wasn't there much," he said. "I was taking care of my wife, who has Alzheimer's. That was my priority. There were other board members who should have spotted something."
Sotta, who served as treasurer for a decade, said his job "was more or less a title."
"All I did was sign checks when I was there. It was not a full-time position. I would have no way of knowing if anything was wrong," Sotta said.
Fellin said directors failed to annually audit financial records from 2003 to 2005. If they had, the financial problems could have been stopped, he said.
Fellin said Weiss allowed Snyder to begin collecting $109.16 a month in pension benefits, despite questions about her role in the misappropriation.
"It is hard to comprehend why he would sign off on Snyder's benefits when there were so many red flags and unanswered questions regarding Snyder's actions as an ... employee," he wrote.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.