Plum student claims IUP reneged on his teaching prospects
Derek Delach's plan to become a teacher has been sidetracked because of a gambling conviction while he was a college student in Florida.
The 28-year-old Plum resident filed suit Friday against Indiana University of Pennsylvania for breach of contract because the university dropped him from its masters of education program after the school was unable to place him as a student teacher.
When he was an undergraduate at Florida State University, Delach was a central figure in an on-campus gambling operation that included then FSU quarterback Adrian McPherson, who ran up an $8,000 gambling debt with Delach.
Delach pleaded no contest in 2003 to felony bookmaking and was sentenced to two years' probation and 30 days at a sheriff's work camp, according to published reports.
Delach, who graduated from Florida State in 2001, was accused of accepting gambling bets from students in 2002. Police searched Delach's home, seizing a computer and other records during the probe. Delach was working as a bartender at the time in a nightspot that was a popular hangout for students and athletes.
According to his lawsuit, Delach said he disclosed his arrest and was told the probationary sentence was similar to the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program in Pennsylvania. A person charged with a certain crime can be placed in ARD for a period of good behavior and have his arrest expunged upon completion of the program.
Delach enrolled at IUP for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years. He began taking classes at IUP's Monroeville campus. Last June, he met with IUP officials to discuss his legal problems in Florida and he was told that his arrest in Florida "wouldn't affect his participation in student teaching."
The lawsuit states that in 2007 Delach was advised that he would not be able to complete the program and obtain a degree because Franklin Regional School District would not accept him because of "his involvement in the criminal incident in Florida."
Delach said he quit his job to enroll at IUP, paid tuition for the two-year program, purchased textbooks and spent money on gas traveling between IUP's main campus in Indiana and the Monroeville branch, according to the lawsuit.
In a Sept. 4, 2007 letter accompanying the lawsuit, Mary Ann Rafoth, dean of the College of Education and Educational Technology, told Delach his record "gave rise to concerns by those school districts and with all of the school districts with which Indiana University of Pennsylvania has affiliation agreements," Rafoth wrote.
"Because you cannot complete the internship, you cannot fulfill the degree requirements. Because you cannot fulfill the degree requirements, you cannot continue in the program."
State law requires that applicants for teaching jobs, student teachers, administrators, substitute teachers, office workers, must undergo background checks that include any criminal history information and obtain a child abuse clearance, according to the state Department of Education.
Delach declined to comment on his lawsuit, which was filed in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. His attorney, Joseph Talarico of Pittsburgh, was unavailable for comment. Michelle Fryling, a spokesman for IUP, declined to comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.