Corbett defends 10% cut to human services
By Brad Bumsted and Michael Macagnone
Published: Tuesday, June 26, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett on Monday defended a proposed 10 percent cut in county human services funding that would take seven separate allocations and bundle them into a single grant.
“People living in local communities know their needs better than Harrisburg,” said Corbett, who would let counties distribute the lump sum.
Department of Public Welfare Secretary Gary Alexander said the change would give counties greater “flexibility” in spending the money.
The proposal is part of the final phase of negotiations on the state budget for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1. Corbett in February proposed a $669 million human services fund, a 20 percent cut. The Senate proposed $753 million, a 10 percent cut. Negotiations continue with the House.
Asked at a news conference whether some money for programs such as child welfare, mental health and drug and alcohol programs could be restored further, Corbett said no. “I don't see it going below the 10 percent cut right now.”
State Rep. Gene DiGirolamo, R-Bucks, the chairman of the House Human Services Committee, said at a separate press conference yesterday he and others had concerns. The block grants could add uncertainty for local providers, he said, who would be at the mercy of year-to-year funding shifts based on county decisions.
“These block grants have the potential to be more damaging than any cuts could be,” he said.
DiGirolamo said the legislature was moving too quickly — he said he had only seen specific language last week — and he needed more time to consider.
Other Republicans and Democrats in the House share his concerns, DiGirolamo said, possibly enough to “put the vote at risk.” He said he and others favor creating a one-year pilot program.
“It makes all the sense in the world,” he said.
Ray Firth, policy initiatives director at the Office of Child Development at the University of Pittsburgh, said a block grant distribution isn't necessarily a bad idea. He said it would make more sense to keep funding at current level, create pilot programs and evaluate the impact on consumers.
Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for the Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 and firstname.lastname@example.org. Michael Macagnone is an intern for the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents Association. He can be reached email@example.com
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.