Share This Page

Trial begins for South Fayette man accused of killing wife over Pens' game

| Monday, June 25, 2012, 6:32 p.m.

An Allegheny County jury began hearing testimony today in the homicide trial of a South Fayette man accused of killing his wife after an argument over a Pittsburgh Penguins game.

Prosecutors accused Robert Abrams, 42, of beating his wife, Jeanette Abrams, 44, in the head with a hammer and stabbing her after the two argued over the late hour of the Penguins' triple-overtime playoff loss April 22, 2010.

Police said Abrams told them he then took a candle, lit a stuffed dog toy and threw it in the living room corner of the house, where it caught the house on fire. He then jumped out a window and went to a neighbor's home and told them his house was on fire.

Testimony is expected to resume Tuesday. Common Pleas Judge Donald E. Machen is presiding over the case.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or bkerlik@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.