ShareThis Page

Cracker tax credit bill to require minimum standards

| Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 11:04 a.m.

HARRISBURG — A tax credit designed to lure a petrochemical company to Beaver County is expected to be voted on in the state House today, a Republican Caucus spokesman said.

The controversial tax credit will be part of a state tax code bill. Despite the imminent vote, the language was not available last night.

Companies seeking state tax credits in 2017 for a proposed ethane cracker plant would need to meet initial thresholds in capital investment and job creation, according to a House member and senator sponsoring legislation to authorize the tax breaks.

In an effort to rebut criticism and gather support, Rep. Jim Christiana, R-Beaver, and Sen. Elder Vogel's Chief of Staff Owen Thomas said the final negotiated tax credit legislation requires that minimum investment and employment standards be met. Those include creation of at least 2,500 jobs and an investment of $1 billion in construction of a plant.

“This is a welcome development and reflects standard practice which attempts to hold companies accountable to meet job targets,” said Sharon Ward, executive director of the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Office. “We hope the bill will include annual reports by the company, also standard practice for economic development subsidies of this type.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, called it “a game changer” in Western Pennsylvania's economy. The minimum standards to qualify are well under numbers used to describe the project for Beaver County.

Royal Dutch Shell plc has said it would invest several billion dollars and the Corbett administration maintains 10,000 to 20,000 jobs would be created.

Most of that is in construction and spin-off employment. The plant would employ hundreds of people.

Corbett proposed a $66 million annual tax credit in hopes of luring Shell to Beaver County, where the company has an option to purchase property for a plant near Monaca.

The $66 million figure is no longer in the legislation, Thomas said. “We don't know if $66 million is the magic number or not,” Thomas said.

The tax credit will no longer be capped under the bill, the governor's office said.

Brian Oros, 51, an ice salesman from Uniontown, said he doesn't trust the job predictions state officials have been making. He's not convinced the credit is necessary or beneficial, considering previous breaks for companies such as Volkswagen, Sony and US Airways that he believes didn't justify the taxpayer expense, he said.

“They're giving this company all these tax breaks, then they're going to put them in the (Keystone Opportunity Zone), a tax-free zone. They're getting it twice, and we've got people out there with no jobs and can't pay their mortgage,” Oros said. “I disagree with it. I figure the gas is here, and they're going come here anyway.”

The amount of tax credit available to a company will be a credit of 5 cents per gallon of ethane purchased from production at the plant.

Critics earlier claimed there was little accountability for the proposal.

Under the legislation, the Department of Revenue will be required to submit an annual report on the credits to the General Assembly.

“This will provide information that will allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of the tax credit. The report must include information on what companies are utilizing the tax credit, as well as the amount,” Thomas said.

The Department of Community and Economic Development will report to the General Assembly in 2028, Thomas said. This report will require DCED to show all of the taxpayers who have been granted tax credits and how much.

The report must also provide the total number of jobs created, the average annual salary and wage information, and the taxes generated, according to Thomas.

Brad Bumsted is state Capitol reporter for the Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 and Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.