Penn State's legal costs in Sandusky case nearly $12M
Penn State's costs for legal counsel and consultants stemming from the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse case were $11.9 million as of April 30, university officials announced today.
Costs included $7.64 million for the university's internal investigation and crisis communications; $2.6 million in university legal fees; $50,178 for external investigations; $870,335 for legal costs for university officers including athletic director Tim Curley, retired vice president Gary Schultz and former president Graham Spanier, as well as $742,584 for “other institutional expenses.”
Sandusky, 68, a retired Nittany Lions defensive coordinator, last week was found guilty of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years, often in university facilities.
Curley and Schultz are awaiting trial on charges that they failed to report allegations against Sandusky and then lied about it to a grand jury. They maintain their innocence.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.