Welfare-to-work standards being waived
Under a new federal directive, states can apply for waivers regarding work requirements under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, commonly known as welfare.
A memo issued on Thursday by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services indicates it can allow states to “test alternative and innovative strategies, policies and procedures that are designed to improve employment outcomes for needy families.”
Critics question the department's authority to allow waivers and complain that the Obama administration is trying to reverse reforms from the mid-1990s.
“What they've done is abolished federal work standards,” said Robert Rector, a welfare expert with the Heritage Foundation, a Washington think tank. “They found a very dubious loophole and are now saying whatever is written in the law doesn't matter.”
The department said Republican and Democratic state officials requested the waivers.
“Federal rules dictate mind-numbing details about how to run a welfare-to-work program. Most states and experts agree that these aren't helpful,” George Sheldon, acting assistant secretary for the department's Administration for Children and Families, said in a statement on the department's website. “The new policy we announced will allow states to test new, more effective ways to help parents successfully prepare for, find, and retain employment.”
Under Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, states receive federal money to develop and implement their own welfare programs. It requires certain levels of participation in activities including job training, vocational educational training or secondary school attendance.
Single parents must participate an average of 30 hours per week, 20 if they have a child younger than 6. Two-parent families must participate for an average of 35 hours a week or 55 hours if they receive federal child care assistance.
“Under current TANF rules, many states report that their caseworkers are spending more time complying with federal documentation requirements than helping parents find jobs. We need state workers spending less time filling out data reports and more time helping parents find employment,” Sheldon wrote.
Some question the department's authority to allow for such waivers.
“Eliminating the work requirements and turning back the clock to once again make welfare a system that simply writes checks is insulting to taxpayers who are already struggling to make ends meet in the Obama economy,” said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
Rachel Weaver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7948 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.