Man sues police, claims cellphone seized after he recorded questioning of disabled friend
A Fayette County man has filed a federal lawsuit against the Point Marion Police Department, alleging that it retaliated against him after learning that he recorded an officer questioning a man.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh on behalf of Gregory Rizer, 51, of 1315 Penn St., Apt. 4, Point Marion. Rizer claims that his constitutional rights were violated during the arrest.
Rizer initially was charged with violating the state's Wiretap Act over the incident on Jan. 3. The complaint was withdrawn by prosecutors in February. Police were forced to return Rizer's cellular telephone that had been confiscated by Officer Kevin Lukart.
Mayor Carl Ables, Chief Jay Stutler and Lukart are named as co-defendants in the lawsuit. Repeated attempts to reach Lukart, Ables and Stutler for comment were unsuccessful on Thursday.
Glen Downey, an attorney at Healey & Hornack in Pittsburgh who works with the ALCU, said police officers “performing their official duties do not possess the requisite reasonable expectation of privacy necessary to be covered by the statute.”
The state Supreme Court has ruled that the state's Wiretap Act — which forbids audio recording without consent of all parties involved — doesn't apply if the person being recorded does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
On Jan. 3, Rizer was at the home of a friend, Shannon Hughes, when Lukart arrived to question Hughes about the whereabouts of her cousin, according to the lawsuit.
Rizer felt that Lukart's questioning was overly aggressive, according to the suit, and Rizer was concerned for Hughes, who is a quadriplegic. Rizer took out his cell phone and began recording the questioning, but when Lukart realized he was being recorded, the officer seized the telephone, the suit states.
Lukart then arrested Rizer, placed him in handcuffs and took him to the police station.
Two days later, Rizer complained to Ables about Lukart's conduct. Rizer subsequently was arrested at his home on charges of violating the state's Wiretap Act.
On Feb. 22, the county district attorney's office dropped the complaint. Rizer, who had no previous criminal record, alleges that after retrieving his cell phone from police, he discovered the memory card containing the police interrogation was missing.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.