PSU may alter role of Dickinson law school
By The Sentinel (Carlisle Pa.)
Published: Sunday, July 29, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Penn State University officials have reiterated its position that the Dickinson School of Law will remain in Carlisle for the forseeable future.
Law School Dean Philip McConnaughay said adjustments to the university's Law School are being considered, but nothing has been set.
One adjustment under consideration is consolidating all first year students in University Park, McConnaughay said.
The adjustment proposal is in response to the national decline in Law School applications, he said.
If school officials consolidate first year students in University Park, it would save “the significant expense and free the resources the Law School devotes to completely duplicated first year curriculums,” he said.
“The Law School would then be able to redirect these resources to additional legal education programs in Carlisle, such as high quality programs for professionals and foreign jurists and lawyers, which would supplement our upper-level Juris Doctorate curriculum in Carlisle,” McConnoughay said.
If the adjustment is approved, it would not occur until fall 2013, at the earliest, and none of the Law School's incoming or current students in Carlisle would be affected, according to McConnaughay.
Borough Council President Perry Heath and Carlisle Mayor Bill Kronenberg said they'd like PSU to meet with local officials to discuss any future plans for Dickinson.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.