2 charged with robbery in TV reality show scam
By Renatta Signorini
Published: Monday, Aug. 6, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Two men are in the Indiana County Jail on charges that they videotaped a robbery and told the victims they were filming for a reality television show called “We Just Got Robbed.”
Randall J. Smith of Templehill, Md., and Artie Goodwine of Memphis were incarcerated Sunday in lieu of $25,000 straight cash bond, jail officials said. The suspects' ages were not available.
In an incident report by Indiana Borough police, two males alerted officers in the area of Sixth and Philadelphia streets that they were being robbed at 1:21 a.m. Sunday. The officers and victims pursued two suspects, apprehending them and identifying them as Smith and Goodwine.
The victims told police the men videotaped the robbery on a cell phone. The suspects stole $20 from the victims, police said.
Smith and Goodwine were arraigned before District Judge Susanne Steffee. Both are charged with robbery, simple assault, harassment, and disorderly conduct. Smith faces an additional charge of resisting arrest, and Goodwine additionally is charged with underage drinking.
Three suspects, one carrying a camera, videotaped a knifepoint robbery in April at a New York City deli in April. The men were caught on surveillance footage.
The October 2011 beating of a Florida man was videotaped and posted to YouTube. The video has since been removed.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.