Carnegie neighbors blame Alcosan project for flooding
When Millie Rutkowski moved to the top of Franklin Avenue in Carnegie more than a decade ago, part of what drew her was the street's well-manicured lawns.
“I thought, ‘Boy, what a nice neighborhood,' and now this,” said Rutkowski, 68.
Today those lawns are filled with weeds, part of the fallout of an Allegheny County Sanitary Authority project last year to separate stormwater and sewer systems in the neighborhood.
Dave Shideler, president of Allison Park Contractors, which did the work, said the company plans to return in September or October to replant grass seeds that did not grow because of the summer heat.
“We've gotten a lot of resistance about coming back, but there's a planting season that happens, and we need to complete the planting during that season,” he said.
Yards filled with weeds are just one problem: Some residents report increased flooding and black mold in basements. A porch separated from a house.
John Oliver, 52, of Carnegie has spent $28,000, including $14,000 on a new roof, after a worker suggested the old roof could be at fault for flooding at the Franklin Avenue house his parents built.
He blames the Alcosan project.
“It's destroyed two summers of everybody's life, and it's still not complete,” said Oliver, who helps his sister Sandy Zielinski care for the house.
The flooding continues, Zielinski said.
“We just want it back the way it was,” Oliver said. “We want somebody to be held accountable and do the right thing.”
Nancy Barylak, an Alcosan spokeswoman, said the agency would continue to monitor residents' complaints and determine who is responsible for the problems.
Shideler said both Alcosan and Carnegie officials signed off on the project.
“I understand (residents) getting a little bit impatient, but unfortunately that's the way construction goes sometimes,” he said.
Adam Wagner is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7956 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.