ShareThis Page

No one injured when officer exchanges gunfire with man outside police station in Cambria County

| Thursday, Sept. 13, 2012, 11:56 a.m.

Police shot a Johnstown man after he opened fire in the parking lot of a Cambria County police station Thursday morning, state police said.

Kevin R. McGee, 45, was in critical condition in Conemaugh Hospital, receiving treatment for a gunshot wound to the torso.

According to a state police report, McGee pulled into the Richland police parking lot at 10:40 a.m. and shot out the rear side window of an unoccupied police cruiser. Two officers inside the station saw the shooting, and one, through a window, ordered McGee to drop his shotgun.

McGee pointed his shotgun toward the officers, and one shot him, police said. In all, only two shots were fired, police said. No one else was injured.

Police charged McGee with attempted homicide, aggravated assault, assault of a law enforcement officer, reckless endangerment, making terroristic threats and criminal mischief.

The police station is near the University of Pittsburgh Johnstown campus and Richland school buildings. The buildings in the school district were briefly locked down.

Police did not offer a motive for the shooting. Online court records show McGee was awaiting a preliminary hearing on drug charges filed against him by Richland police in February.

Police said anyone who had contact with McGee in the last few days or has information should call state police in Ebensburg at 814-471-6500.

Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.