Greensburg Salem board ponders dress code
By Bob Stiles
Published: Thursday, Oct. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Greensburg Salem school directors will consider creating a dress code for students.
Under a proposal discussed Wednesday, directors would vote on a proposal to establish separate clothing regulations for elementary, middle and high school students.
Directors are attempting to avoid problems that arose when dress guidelines changed at the high school shortly before school started in August.
“You just don't tell kids and parents a week before school starts we made these changes,” board member Lee Kunkle said.
While the district has guidelines about dress, there is no formal policy, Superintendent Eileen Amato said. The problem at the high school pointed out the need to make changes, she said.
Kunkle insisted he and other directors formally act on the dress code, rather than have administrators set up the regulations.
“It's policy, and the school board sets policy,” Kunkle said. “That's the problem we have now. We have these guidelines that we're not really reviewing.”
Directors want to vote on the policy months before the next school year starts, so parents are aware of it before shopping for clothing.
Directors indicated during the meeting they oppose making all students wear uniforms.
In another matter, preliminary information sets the district's Act 1 index at 2.2 percent for 2013-14, or the equivalent of a tax increase of up to 1.75 mills, said business manager James Meyer.
Act 1 sets a percentage, or index, for how much districts can increase property taxes, unless they file for exceptions with the state.
District coffers would get about $384,000 more through a 1.75-mill hike, Meyer said.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or bs firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.