Democrat Tim Mahoney captures 4th House term in 51st District
By Liz Zemba
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, 10:54 a.m.
Voters in Fayette County handed incumbent Democrat Tim Mahoney a fourth term in the state House in the 51st District.
With 28 of 33 precincts reporting, Mahoney, 55, of South Union had 62 percent of votes cast, compared to Republican challenger Gary Gearing's 38 percent, according to unofficial election results.
Mahoney thanked voters on Tuesday night.
“I'm just glad people saw through all the spin and negativity,” Mahoney said. “They know I'm going to work for the district the way I've always worked.”
During the campaign, the economy emerged as a top priority.
Mahoney said education would play a key role in attracting new business and jobs to the area. Good schools, he said, will lure potential employers.
“With jobs, it comes back to education,” Mahoney said. “When companies want to locate here, they look at the education, and when our education is not ranking as well as it should be, that makes a difference. If you improve education, I know we can improve the job climate here.”
Gearing, 56, who serves on Uniontown City Council, also cited the economy in his campaign.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.