Four dead, four injured in I-79 crash in Greene County
Four people — three of them teens — died and four others were injured on Wednesday afternoon when a sport utility vehicle crossed Interstate 79 in Greene County, rolled down a steep embankment that forms the grass median and collided with an oncoming motorcycle.
The crash occurred at 4:34 p.m. in the southbound lanes of the interstate near the Ruff Creek exit, a county emergency dispatcher said. The northbound lanes of the interstate are elevated in the area.
The injured were taken to hospitals, including one by medical helicopter.
The three 18-year-old boys killed in the crash were identified as Cullin Frazer, who was driving the SUV, and Benjamin Hardy, both of Waynesburg, and Bryon Kerr of Carmichaels.
The motorcyclist was identified as Michael Cohen, 47, of Oshawa, Canada.
Hospitalized with minor injuries were three other boys from Waynesburg who were passengers in the SUV: Justin Gillogly, 16, Thomas Miller, 16, and Joseph Lilly, 18.
A passenger on the motorcycle, Sandra Cohen, 48, of Oshawa, suffered moderate injuries.
All four were taken to Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown.
State police Trooper Barton Lemansky said police did not know why the SUV crossed the median. He said the vehicle glanced off a camper before colliding with the motorcycle.
No one in the camper was hurt, Lemansky said.
The southbound lanes of the interstate were closed for several hours, and traffic was detoured along Route 19 from the Marianna exit, police said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.