ShareThis Page

Armstrong commissioners OK board appointments

| Friday, Oct. 5, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

KITTANNING — The Armstrong County Commissioners approved board appointments on Thursday as part of a multi-county 911 technology sharing network.

The county's Emergency Management Agency, along with a dozen other Western Pennsylvania county emergency management agencies, are sharing their communications technology.

The effort is to establish a widespread linked public safety network. Armstrong County will have access to the network for improved radio and phone communications here.

“It allows us to share resources, to share other counties' equipment,” said Ron Baustert, Armstrong 911 Coordinator.

Baustert and the county's Director of Public Safety, Randy Brozenick, were appointed to the Armstrong County WestCore Project Board.

WestCore is the Western Pennsylvania County Regional ESInet which is involved with the design and implementation of a statewide Emergency Services IP network (ESInet) (phones).

The project will enable various agencies to share public safety resources as part of a single network so that they are ready for Next Generation 9-1-1, officials said.

In addition, Brozenick, Baustert, Doug Cuica, Peter Frejkowski, James McAfoose and Greg Baker were appointed by the commissioners to the Armstrong County ICORRS Communications Board.

The Inter-County Digital Radio System, or ICORRS, is a regional radio network that allows first responders to communicate directly with each other.

Mitch Fryer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.