Connellsville undergoes trail town reassessment
As part of a trail town reassessment on Thursday afternoon, nearly a dozen people fanned out across Connellsville, armed with trail town checklists.
Through early next year, community reassessments will be conducted for the six Pennsylvania and two Maryland trail towns along the Great Allegheny Passage.
The project marks the first major assessment since 2007, said William Prince, coordinator of the Trail Town Program.
“The idea today is to take a walk in the field and work through the checklist. We want to appreciate what's been done so far and where we still see areas of improvement,” said Grace Markum, assessment facilitator.
“We know lodging has been an issue,” Prince said.
Goals included discussing what types of businesses to try to attract and what amenities might best provide “a well-rounded visit for all,” Prince said.
Participants were asked to complete a checklist that reviews traffic and access issues, including safety and parking; perception of businesses, from window displays to grocers and restaurants; and speciality shops such as cafes and candy or ice cream vendors.
Participants were asked to check for bike rentals and racks, convenience stores and cash machines.
They checked the cleanliness of store windows, the condition of sidewalks, number of benches and trash cans.
Notes were made about the number of trail-access parking spots, drinking fountains and public restrooms.
Inside Crawford Avenue's West Side News, proprietors Ed and Rita Bornstein said they receive a lot of out-of-town business from trail users.
Open seven days a week, they said they have chatted with visitors from Australia, Germany and England, and often recommend local restaurants.
“We know most of the stores in the area,” Rita Bornstein said.
“They are ambassadors to what you are trying to do,” Markum told the assessment group.
At the Connellsville Bed and Breakfast, owner John King estimated 60 percent of his and wife Lucille's business comes from trail riders.
Back at the Yough River Trail Council building, evaluators reviewed pluses and minuses from their tours.
James McIntire, trail council vice president, noted recent efforts to clean up the downtown area.
He also noted ground was broken recently on Crawford Avenue for the Connellsville Canteen Coffee Shop and Harry Clark's Indian Creek Valley Railroad Display, a Fayette County Cultural Trust project.
“I think that is going to be a big attraction for Connellsville,” McIntire said.
Emma Strong, project leader with Trail Town Outreach Corps, suggested a sign directing trail users to the city's business district.
One downside several people mentioned was businesses not posting clearly visible hours of operation, or closing on Sunday, when trail use may be heavier.
Markum wondered if business operators who have found success in other trail towns might consider setting up shop in Connellsville.
City sustainability coordinator Geno Gallo suggested a coffee shop or hostel to anchor the West Side and encouraging visitor exploration downtown.
Murals were suggested to brighten up the blank sides of some buildings, visible to approaching cyclists.
Suggestions included more greenery and “No Littering” signs.
Several mentioned the new garbage cans and benches on city sidewalks.
A few noted the decorative windows at the former Big Apple Gear storefront.
“We could encourage more of that,” Prince said.
After reviewing information from the town trail checklists and meeting notes, Prince will release a report summarizing findings.
The report will be used in the development of potential priorities and projects.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.