Upper Tyrone supervisors to study roads, speeding
With safety issues a concern, Upper Tyrone Township supervisors have directed its engineering firm to assess three roads to determine if guiderails are needed.
Certain sections of Mt. East Road, Woods Road and Dry Hill Road will be studied. Engineers will perform ease assessments. Supervisors will decide at a later date if guiderails should be installed.
In other matters:
• Supervisors plan to consider several options to combat speeding, such as creating speed humps on the township roads.
“A speed hump is different then a speed bump,” Edwards said. “A speed bump is short and high. A speed hump is lower, about two or three inches; they are about 10 to 12 feet long.”
Edwards said supervisors also can contact Everson and Scottdale police to determine whether either department can help with enforcing speed limits in problem areas.
• Supervisors were asked for updates on a proposed sewage project. They have been trying to obtain funding for at least three years.
“Funding is hard to get, and we will be looking at a proposal tonight to finish the design,” said Supervisor Bill Edwards. “All I can say is that we are in the process.”
• The state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources informed supervisors that it will extend a grant awarded to the Coal and Coke Trail extension project. Trail officials ran into problems acquiring rights-of-way in certain areas.
• Supervisors hired Jacob Whipkey as a part-time laborer, at the rate of $12 an hour, with a six-month probationary period. The effective date of his start isn't determined yet.
• Supervisors passed a motion to purchase a new F450 diesel dump truck through the COSTARS program.
Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.