Ligonier officials debate antique shop plans
Ligonier Township supervisors and Laughlintown property owner Darl Dodson can't seem to agree even now that the permit for his antique shop has been approved.
During their meeting on Tuesday, supervisors issued Dodson a list of conditions for approval of the Center Street antique shop that came out of an Oct. 2 meeting.
The plan was originally denied in December by the supervisors, who said the proposal for a handicapped-accessible sidewalk 5 feet from Center Street could lead to accidents between pedestrians and motorists.
After Dodson and his wife, Marsima, filed an appeal with the Westmoreland Court of Common Pleas, Judge Anthony Marsili ruled in August that the township could not deny the plan without presenting any evidence of the danger.
Supervisors approved the plan at the special meeting on Oct. 2, but Dodson said on Tuesday that he objected to one of the conditions the supervisors attached to the approval.
The condition states that Dodson will be responsible for damage done to township vehicles caused by the sidewalk built in the right of way.
“That's like saying that if a township vehicle takes out the corner of my house, I'll have to pay for the damage of the truck because the house is in the right of way.”
“We're concerned that if we're plowing snow and we catch our plows on that sidewalk, it's going to bust up our snow plow,” said Supervisor Carl Penrod.
Dodson asked the supervisors to revisit that condition, which Supervisor Keith Whipkey said might be possible after the sidewalk is constructed and inspected.
In other news, Penrod submitted his letter of resignation effective Jan. 3.
The township will accept applications until Oct. 31 to fill the vacant position, which will be held until the next municipal election in November 2013.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.