Judge rejects sex offender's motion to dismiss Fayette charges
A convicted sex offender from Ohio who faces similar allegations in Fayette County lost a bid to get some of the charges dismissed, even though the alleged victims were too afraid to testify against him in court.
Joseph M. Trifiro, 28, of 367 Main St., Lemont Furnace, is charged by Trooper Heather Clem of state police at Uniontown with two counts each of aggravated indecent assault and indecent assault.
Trifiro is accused of inappropriately touching two girls, ages 5 and 7, in September 2011 in a South Union residence.
Trifiro appeared in court on Tuesday for a hearing on a motion filed by his attorney, David Kaiser of Uniontown. Kaiser wanted the aggravated indecent assault charges dismissed before trial.
Both girls were at the courthouse for the hearing. At the request of Assistant District Attorney Linda Cordaro, Judge Steve Leskinen ordered that they did not have to testify under the state's tender years statute for children younger than 12.
Leskinen issued the order after the girls' caretaker testified that the 5-year-old wet her pants when she saw Trifiro in the hallway outside the courtroom, and Clem said both girls were too nervous to testify during a March preliminary hearing on the charges.
In lieu of the alleged victims' testimony, Leskinen heard from Clem, who testified that the girls reported in two interviews that Trifiro had touched them inappropriately.
Trifiro, who according to court records was convicted in 2010 in Ohio of gross sexual imposition for an incident involving an 8-year-old child, is in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of at least $75,000 bail.
In addition to the sex assault charges, Trifiro faces trial in unrelated cases for allegedly selling heroin to a confidential police informant in South Union and failing to register as a sex offender when he moved from Ohio to Pennsylvania after his conviction there.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.