DuBois man pleads guilty to DUI death
A Clearfield County man admitted on Thursday that he was driving while intoxicated when he caused an accident that killed his passenger in Armstrong County in September, 2011.
Richard Louis Sickeri, 44, of 398 Sabula Outing Club Road, DuBois, pleaded guilty to the second-degree felony charge of homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence, the more severe of three counts against him.
Sickeri offered the plea at the start of his jury trial in Armstrong County Court yesterday morning.
Sickeri was behind the wheel of a Chevy pickup when he attempted to pass a tractor trailer while driving north along Route 66/28 south of Distant in Mahoning shortly after midnight on Sept. 3, 2011. His truck clipped the other truck's front end, veered off the road and crashed into trees.
Nicole Duttry, 35, of Duttry Road, Sabula, Clearfield County, was in the passenger seat and died of blunt force trauma to the head as a result of the crash.
Prosecutors said Sickeri had a blood alcohol content of .157 percent. The legal limit in Pennsylvania is .08 percent.
Armstrong County District Attorney Scott Andreassi told the court that the prosecution was prepared to prove that the defendant's alcohol consumption led directly to Duttry's death.
Andreassi said the other charges were homicide by vehicle and driving under the influence of alcohol. “He plead to the most serious charge,” said Andreassi.
Armstrong County President Judge Kenneth G. Valasek set a sentencing date for Jan. 27.
Sickeri faces a minimum of three years and up to 10 years in prison.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.