2 Fayette men arrested for gun charges
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Two men are accused of having semiautomatic weapons during an incident at a public housing complex in Uniontown.
Kevin Anthony Sublett Jr., 20, of Uniontown, is charged with two counts of firearms not to be carried without a license. Hosea Gardie Craggette II, 22, of Lemont Furnace, is charged with possession, possession of marijuana and firearms not to be carried without a license.
In criminal complaints, Uniontown Police said they went to Pershing Court 3:36 a.m. Wednesday for a report of a man threatening another person at gunpoint.
When they arrived, police said, Sublett hid a semiautomatic 9mm rifle in bushes in front of 118 Pershing Court and Craggette hid a .45-caliber semiautomatic handgun in another set of bushes. Both men were then apprehended and the weapons were recovered, according to the complaints.
Police said they found a third weapon, a 9 mm Ruger handgun, while searching Sublett. Craggette was found to be in possession of $1,560 cash and suspected marijuana and crack cocaine, according to police.
Sublett, according to the complaint, told police he bought the semiautomatic rifle “from a crack head for $30.”
Both men were arraigned before Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros and placed in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of bond pending preliminary hearings.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.