Fayette Craigslist case hits snag
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Criminal charges against one of five men accused of using Craigslist ads to lure people to Uniontown to be robbed have been dismissed but are likely to be refiled, according to a prosecutor.
Charges of conspiracy, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and attempted robbery were dismissed against Ishmael DeShields, 18, of 53 Varndell St., Uniontown, when the victim did not appear for a hearing on Tuesday before Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros.
Assistant District Attorney J.W. Eddy said the witness was not notified of the hearing because the phone police used to contact him is in evidence.
Once police are able to contact the victim, Eddy said the charges likely will be filed again.
Two other Uniontown men, Roy Johnson Jr. of 138 Searight Ave. and Warare Wilkerson of 68 Pershing Court were held for trial on charges of conspiracy and reckless endangerment.
A fourth man, Xavier Thomas, 20, of 217 Union Street, Uniontown, faces a preliminary hearing Oct. 16 and a fifth man, Kyle Bass, is wanted on an arrest warrant.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.